The cloud hanging over Move…
…just got a little darker: Homestore CEO’s fraud conviction overturned.
Investors can’t appreciate the prospects of a new trial.
Search
Subscribe
Rooms worth visiting
- Front Porch -- Best place to ask a question, share some tips (gossip!) or contact me for any reason whatsoever. Coffee is always fresh here!
- Media Room -- Great place to see me showing off. Lots of info in this room about my speaking experience, previous presentations, and how I can help make your next real estate event a rock'n success.
- Tool Shed -- This is where I keep all the best real estate and online marketing tools hidden. From CRM and lead management tools to social networking and mobile ideas to analytics and tracking tools, I've got a bit of everything in there.
Recent Comments
- Publishing from my phone??? (3)
- Val: Hi Dustin. I enjoy reading your blog. Another app I think you may find of interest is from...
- Dustin: sweet! You’re gonna keep me busy all night playing with apps!
- Joel Burslem: A couple more that I would highly recommend: Reeder (http://reederapp.com/) –...
- “How likely is this person to send me business?” (5)
- Dustin: You’re very welcome… Gist is definitely not the easiest tool to get...
- Peter Casale: Dustin – after reading your prior post “Screw consumers” I...
- My last post got me thinking about a pol… (1)
- Paul: I’ll answer this from the perspective of a real estate investor. I bring my golden...
- Been a ridiculously great morning at the… (5)
- Publishing from my phone??? (3)
Connect
Tag Cloud
4RealzEd ActiveRain ads Agents Advice analytics blog blogging bubble consumers economy email event Facebook Google Inman News interview Legal LinkedIn listing listings mapping market Marketing MLS mortgage move.com NAR neighborhood real estate Realtor.com Redfin search SEO Social Media Strategy social network tools traffic Trulia twitter video web2.0 website wordpress Yahoo ZillowCategories
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- August 2006
- July 2006
Spencer 10:48 pm on January 18, 2008 Permalink |
Dustin,
MOVE spent $11M on Wolff’s defense so far. It’s unclear to me whether they have to continue to pay for his defense in the case of a retrial. Maybe you can do some snooping around and let us all know…
This is from MOVE’s 10-K:
In July 2005, Stuart Wolff (“Wolff”), the Company’s former chairman and chief executive officer, filed a suit against the Company in the Delaware Chancery Court in New Castle County. The complaint sought advancement of expenses (including attorneys’ fees) purportedly incurred and to be incurred by Wolff in connection with the SEC and the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) investigations and certain civil actions filed against Wolff. Effective September 28, 2005, the Company entered into a settlement agreement to reimburse Wolff $11.0 million for expenses incurred in his defense. The Company has no further financial obligations to Wolff. The Company recorded legal costs associated with Wolff of approximately $8.0 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which have been reflected in general and administrative expense.
Dustin 4:56 am on January 20, 2008 Permalink |
Spencer: The way I read the story, it seems pretty clear that Move worked a deal out with him that caps their legal fees at $11M. I could send a message to try to confirm, but I doubt I’ll hear a response.
I think the bigger impact of a new trial wouldn’t be on the company’s legal fees, but rather on the impact that a flood of new bad press would have on the stock price. My guess is there are more than a few investors who don’t like the idea of owning stock in a company where the former CEO is on trial (again) for fraud.
Spencer 11:07 pm on January 21, 2008 Permalink |
Dustin, I did some more digging and it looks like MOVE’s exposure on legal costs is indeed capped at the $11M they’ve already spent. Bummer for Stuart Wolff, huh?
Yes, I agree though, a retrial will still be bad news for MOVE due to the distraction and bad press which will surely follow.
Dustin 11:48 pm on January 21, 2008 Permalink |
No doubt it is a bummer for Stuart… but given the choice between no retrial and paying for one, I can only imagine he is happy with the outcome.