<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4realz Roundtable @ 1pm PST: How Appraisal Rule Changes will Affect Real Estate Professionals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4realz.net/2008/07/4realz-roundtable-1pm-pst-how-appraisal-rule-changes-will-affect-real-estate-professionals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4realz.net/2008/07/4realz-roundtable-1pm-pst-how-appraisal-rule-changes-will-affect-real-estate-professionals/</link>
	<description>Authentic Real Estate and Internet Marketing Conversations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 4realz Roundtable is Back: Using Facebook Pages to Generate Business! &#124; 4realz.net</title>
		<link>http://4realz.net/2008/07/4realz-roundtable-1pm-pst-how-appraisal-rule-changes-will-affect-real-estate-professionals/#comment-4041</link>
		<dc:creator>4realz Roundtable is Back: Using Facebook Pages to Generate Business! &#124; 4realz.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4realz.wordpress.com/?p=765#comment-4041</guid>
		<description>[...] How Appraisal Rule Changes will Affect Real Estate Professionals [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Appraisal Rule Changes will Affect Real Estate Professionals [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matrix &#187; [In The Media] 4Realz Roundtable On Appraisals Cuomo/GSE Agreement For 1-1-09</title>
		<link>http://4realz.net/2008/07/4realz-roundtable-1pm-pst-how-appraisal-rule-changes-will-affect-real-estate-professionals/#comment-2359</link>
		<dc:creator>Matrix &#187; [In The Media] 4Realz Roundtable On Appraisals Cuomo/GSE Agreement For 1-1-09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4realz.wordpress.com/?p=765#comment-2359</guid>
		<description>[...] 4realz Roundtable: How Appraisal Rule Changes will Affect Real Estate Professionals [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4realz Roundtable: How Appraisal Rule Changes will Affect Real Estate Professionals [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://4realz.net/2008/07/4realz-roundtable-1pm-pst-how-appraisal-rule-changes-will-affect-real-estate-professionals/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4realz.wordpress.com/?p=765#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>Goodtimepolitics:  Everything I&#039;ve read about the issue is that it&#039;s way overblown in that you can&#039;t know if Obama got a deal or not unless you knew his credit score, which obviously you don&#039;t since it&#039;s not published.  Much to do about nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodtimepolitics:  Everything I&#8217;ve read about the issue is that it&#8217;s way overblown in that you can&#8217;t know if Obama got a deal or not unless you knew his credit score, which obviously you don&#8217;t since it&#8217;s not published.  Much to do about nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodtimepolitics</title>
		<link>http://4realz.net/2008/07/4realz-roundtable-1pm-pst-how-appraisal-rule-changes-will-affect-real-estate-professionals/#comment-2357</link>
		<dc:creator>goodtimepolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4realz.wordpress.com/?p=765#comment-2357</guid>
		<description>Will the rules keep this from happening?
http://goodtimepolitics.com/2008/07/06/obama-joins-chris-dodd-by-getting-a-sweeter-than-normal-mortgage-deal/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the rules keep this from happening?<br />
<a href="http://goodtimepolitics.com/2008/07/06/obama-joins-chris-dodd-by-getting-a-sweeter-than-normal-mortgage-deal/" rel="nofollow">http://goodtimepolitics.com/2008/07/06/obama-joins-chris-dodd-by-getting-a-sweeter-than-normal-mortgage-deal/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Feather</title>
		<link>http://4realz.net/2008/07/4realz-roundtable-1pm-pst-how-appraisal-rule-changes-will-affect-real-estate-professionals/#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>David Feather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 04:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4realz.wordpress.com/?p=765#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>I listened in on the roundtable and I think that both appraisers and lenders are finally catching on to the unintended consequences of the upcoming changes.
Many of the changes are excellent but two things were obviously flawed.
1. Banks should not have been excluded.
2. AMCs (with their current business model) are not the solution.

I see two solutions to these problems.
1. Either regulate ALL lenders equally or make banks abide by the same rules regarding appraisal orders.  In short...create a level playing field for everyone.
2. I have no problem with AMCs acting as clearing houses for appraisal orders.  I do however have a SERIOUS PROBLEM with appraisers footing the bill for this clearing house.  In a nutshell, AMCs were allowed to proliferate because they provided lenders with a way to cut costs by outsourcing the appraisal ordering process.   In fact AMCs sell their services to lenders proclaiming to be a &quot;value added service&quot;.  How about those instances where an AMC was involved and yet HUD-1 states that the appraisal fee was $400.  Have the lender &amp; title company not deceived both parties involved?  The actual cost of the APPRAISAL was only $200+/-.  The rest went to &quot;value added services.  I am amazed that some brilliant law office has not caught on to this deception and petitioned to have a law created to prohibit it.  Every lawyer who has ever participated in filling out a HUD-1 has assumed a legal liability by filling it out incorrectly...yet they continue to do it in every state every day.  That being said...now lets move on to my 2nd solution.  The government needs to make lenders pay for those &quot;value added services&quot; that AMCs provide out of their own pocket and (or) pass it on to the borrower.  It was originally their responsibility and there is no reason to pass the fee on to the appraiser.  Doing so will only result in poor quality appraisal work (completed by the lowest bidder with the least amount of experience).  If someone has a better solution...please write me at investsmart@earthlink.net

David Feather</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listened in on the roundtable and I think that both appraisers and lenders are finally catching on to the unintended consequences of the upcoming changes.<br />
Many of the changes are excellent but two things were obviously flawed.<br />
1. Banks should not have been excluded.<br />
2. AMCs (with their current business model) are not the solution.</p>
<p>I see two solutions to these problems.<br />
1. Either regulate ALL lenders equally or make banks abide by the same rules regarding appraisal orders.  In short&#8230;create a level playing field for everyone.<br />
2. I have no problem with AMCs acting as clearing houses for appraisal orders.  I do however have a SERIOUS PROBLEM with appraisers footing the bill for this clearing house.  In a nutshell, AMCs were allowed to proliferate because they provided lenders with a way to cut costs by outsourcing the appraisal ordering process.   In fact AMCs sell their services to lenders proclaiming to be a &#8220;value added service&#8221;.  How about those instances where an AMC was involved and yet HUD-1 states that the appraisal fee was $400.  Have the lender &amp; title company not deceived both parties involved?  The actual cost of the APPRAISAL was only $200+/-.  The rest went to &#8220;value added services.  I am amazed that some brilliant law office has not caught on to this deception and petitioned to have a law created to prohibit it.  Every lawyer who has ever participated in filling out a HUD-1 has assumed a legal liability by filling it out incorrectly&#8230;yet they continue to do it in every state every day.  That being said&#8230;now lets move on to my 2nd solution.  The government needs to make lenders pay for those &#8220;value added services&#8221; that AMCs provide out of their own pocket and (or) pass it on to the borrower.  It was originally their responsibility and there is no reason to pass the fee on to the appraiser.  Doing so will only result in poor quality appraisal work (completed by the lowest bidder with the least amount of experience).  If someone has a better solution&#8230;please write me at <a href="mailto:investsmart@earthlink.net">investsmart@earthlink.net</a></p>
<p>David Feather</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie B</title>
		<link>http://4realz.net/2008/07/4realz-roundtable-1pm-pst-how-appraisal-rule-changes-will-affect-real-estate-professionals/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4realz.wordpress.com/?p=765#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
