I thought it was interesting when he recently took a shot at Rich Barton and Pete Flint (twice), but my jaw dropped when I started reading his post criticizing (to put it nicely) Move’s opperation of Realtor.com.
Topics
Recent Comments
- Getting more value out of your LinkedIn connections… (4)
- Dustin: Really? One of your favorites, huh? Care to give some tips on how you use it?
- Ricardo Bueno: You know, to this day, LinkedIn happens to be one of my favorite networks.
- Dustin: I hear you… I haven’t been very motivated to play on LinkedIn… but I...
- Alex Cortez: Heading over to LinkedIn to write Kris a recommendation. She’s one of those RE...
- Jim Frye: I think it relies on the thought process of the person. Most of people will most likely...
- Dustin: Hey, your site looks great! Hope to see you in New Orleans!
- Dustin: working on it… #narleans (pretty sure it didn’t sound right though…)
- stephanie crawford: I haven’t decided on whether or not I’m going to NARdiGras yet,...
Archives





I don’t know him but I am pretty impressed with him so far – after reading that post. Thanks for pointing me to it.
Russell: By way of background, he is a founder of ActiveRain…
He makes some excellent points. The problem may be the bureaucratic structure of NAR; getting them to do anything before the market turns, whether that’s in 6 or 36 months could prove impossible.
Glad I gave you a thrill Dustin. I would disagree about two shots being thrown at Zillow and Trulia. The second post was a shot more aimed at the lack of effort being put out by real estate’s old guard than it was a follow up shot at Trulia and Zillow.
I enjoyed his post about Realtor.com. I do believe that they could better serve the real estate industry in their offerings and the price being offered to realtors. Jonathan makes a point about buying the assests but I think more importantly about NAR looking out for members in the offerings at realtor.com. We have found in our testing that money spent on realtor.com produces far fewer results than those spent on our own websites.