<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google releasing a new browser tomorrow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4realz.net/2008/09/google-releasing-a-new-browser-tomorrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4realz.net/2008/09/google-releasing-a-new-browser-tomorrow/</link>
	<description>Authentic Real Estate and Internet Marketing Conversations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://4realz.net/2008/09/google-releasing-a-new-browser-tomorrow/#comment-2815</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4realz.net/?p=791#comment-2815</guid>
		<description>Despite its Webkit roots, Chrome has a UI that wasn&#039;t beaten with the Apple Human Interface Guidelines ugly stick like Safari for Windows was. If Google gives it a half decent debugger, get a good add-on ecosystem going, and fix more Webkit bugs than Apple has, it could gain some measurable market share.

I think it’ll easily beat Safari &amp; Opera on Windows as the #3 web browser on Windows within 12 months. However, topping IE or Firefox is going to be a long tough slog. Webkit based browsers (both Chrome &amp; Safari) are currently too rough around the edges compared to Firefox or IE to be a real threat in the next year. 

If they throw enough engineers at it, it could be major player in a short time. Google has the brand and the engineering talent to compete with the leaders. Should be fun to watch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite its Webkit roots, Chrome has a UI that wasn&#8217;t beaten with the Apple Human Interface Guidelines ugly stick like Safari for Windows was. If Google gives it a half decent debugger, get a good add-on ecosystem going, and fix more Webkit bugs than Apple has, it could gain some measurable market share.</p>
<p>I think it’ll easily beat Safari &amp; Opera on Windows as the #3 web browser on Windows within 12 months. However, topping IE or Firefox is going to be a long tough slog. Webkit based browsers (both Chrome &amp; Safari) are currently too rough around the edges compared to Firefox or IE to be a real threat in the next year. </p>
<p>If they throw enough engineers at it, it could be major player in a short time. Google has the brand and the engineering talent to compete with the leaders. Should be fun to watch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Cammarosano</title>
		<link>http://4realz.net/2008/09/google-releasing-a-new-browser-tomorrow/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Cammarosano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4realz.net/?p=791#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>Seems like Google needs the default setting to be Google. On IE they have to rely on people setting the default page or installing the tool bar.
A smart move by google. This is something they should have done long ago instead of some of the projects on this page
http://www.google.com/intl/en/options/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like Google needs the default setting to be Google. On IE they have to rely on people setting the default page or installing the tool bar.<br />
A smart move by google. This is something they should have done long ago instead of some of the projects on this page<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/options/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/intl/en/options/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
