The great folks at Inman News have asked me to put together a 15 minute presentation at SF Connect this year… and I’m downright excited about it. The title of my presentation: 50 Technologies To Help You Survive the Downturn.
I’ve got some huge shoes to fill in that both Jamie Glenn of Trulia and Brian Boero of 1000watt have given versions of this presentation at recent Connect Events… and their presentations were top notch.
The Plan?
I’ve been given 15 minutes to talk about 50 technologies… Let’s break down into what that means in terms of the amount of time I have to explain each technology. Fifteen minutes is 900 seconds. Given the fact that I at least have to introduce myself and let my audience know I’m available for speaking gigs, I’ve already blow 30 seconds right there… Combined with the fact that I’ll need at least two 10-second water breaks, I’m down to 850 seconds or 17 seconds per technology! I’m known for speaking fast, but the pressure is really going to be on!
I Need Your Help!
Real estate agents: Do you have a favorite tool or technology that has become indispensable at making your business operations more efficient? My preference is online tools, but I’ve have to find 50 of them, so I’m honestly not very picky at the moment!
Real estate tech providers: Do you have a tool you think is worthy of being featured at SF Connect? Let me know, but make sure I can “sell” it 17 seconds or less! I make no promises, but again, I’ve got to find 50 tools in less than 50 days, so I’d appreciate any help you can give!
My Bag of Tricks
Here’s an outline of the previous presentation.
Jamie Glenn:
- Listing Sites (12 sites)
- Social Media (9 sites)
- Multimedia (15 sites)
- Communication (7 sites)
- Blogging (9)
Total: 52 sites! Plus, his last slide through in 9 “bonus” resources!
Brian Boero:
- Things that will help you work smarter and cut costs (10 actions)
- Things that let you engage customers and prospects in new ways (8 actions)
- Things that will help you grow your professional network (3 actions)
- Blogs you should read (and watch) (7 actions)
- Market smarter – and cheaper (6 actions)
- New advertising opportunities (5 actions)
- Technologies that help you leverage your knowledge (3 actions)
- Things that shrink space and time (3 actions)
- Technologies that help you meet the neighbors (4 actions)
Total: 49 actions. Although much to his credit, each-and-every “action” included at least one technology tool and many of them included multiple tools!!!
I have both presentations in front of me, and I can tell you that they both did an excellent job of providing a wealth of information in only 15 minutes!
My Presentation
Lucky for me, I still have over a month! Unlucky for me, I just typed out all the notes I’ve taken to date and I have only 33 technologies listed that are appropriate for the title: “50 Technologies To Help You Survive the Downturn.”
Here’s an outline of how I grouped the various tools, concepts, websites so far (but note, I’m positive the final outline will be MUCH different):
- Online Marketing Basics
- Publishing Tools
- CRMs
- Inspiration
- Analytics
- Listing Syndication
- Listing Tools
- Connecting with Consumers
- Connecting with Professionals
- Video Podcasts
- Communications
- Identity Management
However, rather than bias you’all by starting with my list of sites I would include (or listing out the websites from the the previous presentations), I’d LOVE LOVE LOVE to hear some of the tools, techniques and technologies that you think would be worthy of being included in this list!
Jim Reppond 4:23 pm on November 21, 2008 Permalink |
Let’s see… that’s works out to a loss of just over 70% of it’s value since August 15th when it closed at $2.99. I know the market has tanked for everyone. But that says a LOT for the lack of confidence investors have in this company. It probably doesn’ t help to remember that back in 2006 when they were called HomeStore.com the former COO and CEO were convicted of investor fraud and sentenced to 15 years in jail. I’m assuming they are still in jail and not running the company again… right?
Michael Wurzer 4:36 pm on November 21, 2008 Permalink |
Dustin, I’m not entirely sure but I don’t think that litigation is the major mapping patent case most have been focused on as that involves what has become known as the 989 patent.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5032989.html
I’m not sure if the cases are related or not, but thought I’d mention it.
Dustin 5:19 pm on November 21, 2008 Permalink |
Jim: There’s definitely new management since those troubles…
Dustin 5:20 pm on November 21, 2008 Permalink |
Michael: I came in after the lawsuits had already started and did my best to stay away from them. Considering I’m not sure which patent this lawsuit refers to means I did at least somewhat of a good job not getting involved!
Jim Duncan 6:08 pm on November 21, 2008 Permalink |
In all honesty, I’d love to see NAR look at, and show the membership, how feasible/expensive/cheap it would be to reclaim RDC.
How much closer to zero does it have to get? And what are Move’s options to earn profit other than advertising or “upselling” to the members/Realtors?
Loren Nason 6:17 pm on November 21, 2008 Permalink |
woopideedoo!
A patent to put listings on a map
BIG F****N DEAL!
That patent is just as bogus as Amazons one-click patent
I should patent a special device that closes the traps of stupid patent lawyer scum.
It’s called Duct Tape
but my patent will be for STFU Tape its a special type of Duct Tape that makes people STFU.
Ok I feel better now
Irina Netchaev 10:03 am on November 23, 2008 Permalink |
It’ll be interesting to see when NAR steps in and takes over. Once they do, how will they make Move.com more realtor friendly.
Move has been taking advantage of realtors for years. I’m not to sad to see them tank.
I am sad about the timing of your stock options. THAT SUCKS!!!!
Dustin 11:19 am on November 23, 2008 Permalink |
It will be interesting… Mike Simonsen mentioned (in a tweet) that the stock could go all the way to zero… which is theoretically possible, but I just don’t see it. It also seems clear to me that if NAR would buy out Move, they’d have to spin off companies like Moving.com, Top Producer and Move.com (especially move.com since NAR likely has no place running the official website of the national association of new home builders.)
Jay Valento - Long Beach Real Estate 7:25 pm on November 24, 2008 Permalink |
Buy it back and take it down…have the consumer go to the local market to find homes from happy real estate professionals that provide excellent content on their websites.
Dustin 7:33 pm on November 24, 2008 Permalink |
Jay: Are you suggesting that REALTORS are a good resource for local listings and information?
Jay Valento - Long Beach Real Estate 8:40 pm on November 24, 2008 Permalink |
Yes. Most of my clients don’t go to Realtor.com for anything. I have found listings on Realtor.com that are a year old…I am a little confused…I list a house. Realtor.com posts it on their website for free. Then, they turn around and ask me to pay for advertising….shouldn’t they be paying me for the opportunity to display my listing to their audience? It is quite crazy.
Dustin 9:06 pm on November 24, 2008 Permalink |
Jay: You make a great point… I was just teasing you a bit with my question. Of course REALTORS should be the local expert and while I *could* make an argument for the opposite case, in general, I agree that the listings of all agents collectively are more valuable to realtor.com than the value of realtor.com to any one agent.
Kevin Tomlinson-Miami Beach Real Estate 10:14 pm on November 24, 2008 Permalink |
The lower the better. Let’s get it back in our own hands.
Hey, do you think Realogy will make it?
Jay Valento - Long Beach CA Real Estate 10:57 pm on November 24, 2008 Permalink |
I know you know Dustin….is there a place to post topic questions?
Dustin 11:42 pm on November 24, 2008 Permalink |
sure… best place is to head over to the 4realz hotlist where you can post just about anything you like. I moderate new users, but only until folks get the hang of using the tool!
Dustin 11:44 pm on November 24, 2008 Permalink |
Kevin: Don’t know enough about realogy, but the Notorious Rob recently made a great case for them being fine in the long run…